09/01/2022 / By Roy Green
Without a doubt, 5G carries with it health risks. Doctors, researchers and scientists know about it and the general public is aware of the dangers the fifth-generation mobile network poses to humans.
Unfortunately, there’s no way to avoid the 5G technology completely as they’re practically everywhere in modern society. From cellphones to microwave ovens, to smart gadgets and appliances, exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation is inevitable.
Since nobody knows exactly how much 5G millimeter Wave the fragile body can withstand without serious repercussions, it’s best to limit the exposure to acceptable world levels.
Even the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which was tasked to regulate interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire and cable, admits there are no 5G studies funded by the agency in this regard and that none are planned.
The lack of reference materials with regard to the health risks involving 5G is appalling. As of August 1, there were more than 35,000 articles on EMFs, but only seven of them are medical or biological studies. Clearly, the FCC is being controlled by the telecom industry and is in no hurry to know the extent of possible 5G effects like skin and ocular melanoma and sterility as it would alarm the public.
Private entities, however, have taken the initiative to conduct studies and have uncovered some worrisome facts.
Long and frequent use of cellphones can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and nuclear DNA damage from free radicals.
Likewise, excessive exposure to Wi-Fi networks has been linked to chronic diseases, such as cardiac arrhythmias, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s and infertility.
In 2015, more than 230 international scientists appealed to the United Nations for protection from prolonged EMF exposure.
They noted that probable damages aren’t confined to humans, as “there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.” (Related: NOT JUST HUMANS: Scientists say 5G radiation is killing animals and wildlife.)
The effects, on the other hand, “include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders and negative impacts on general well-being in humans.”
In September 2017, more than 180 scientists and doctors from 35 countries called for a moratorium on 5G “until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.”
They stressed that “RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful to humans and the environment,” and that “5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place.”
Some scientists and analysts wanted to slow down 5G deployment or stop its employment till health issues are resolved.
Concerned individuals like Martin Bouygues, the CEO of French telecoms firm Bouygues, has joined the call for governments to postpone auctions for 5G frequencies, citing the ongoing Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and public mistrust of the technology.
Countries like Belgium and Switzerland heeded the call and are delaying their 5G rollout in order to create a system to monitor radiation. Some areas like Syracuse, New York and New Hampshire have safeguards in place while Mill Valley, near San Francisco, banned new 5G wireless cells.
Unfortunately, more areas went along with the “5G is safe” line espoused by the FCC and the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA), which is the United States wireless industry trade association.
Visit 5GAlert.com for more news related to 5G.
Watch the video below about the hidden dangers of 5G.
This video is from the Themoreuknow channel on Brighteon.com.
The dark reality of 5G technology: What is the 5G Dragnet?
Untested 5G radiation linked to adverse health effects, warn UK researchers.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
5g, cellphone, dangerous, Ecology, EMF, environment, FCC, health hazards, internet, mobile network, radiation, radiofrequency, smart meters, telecom industry, Wi-Fi, wireless cells
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 RADIATION SCIENCE